To be completely honest, I had zero clue what a writing process was, let alone what mine was . I am painfully unaware of the steps I take when I write, so I
figured it was safe to assume that I am very disorganized with my thoughts.
Despite being this negligent to my own thinking, I've written a plethora of papers
throughout high school and here at the U of A. It just happens. So in order to figure
out which type of writer I am, I actually had to act like I was about to write
something very long and important, and observe what I would do and how I would
feel before, during, and after writing such a paper. Turns out, I'm a bit more
organized than I thought...
What kind of writer am I??
Given the four
types of writers, I believe I am a sequential composer. I find that writing
my paper goes much smoother when I have written out how I want it to be
organized. This helps with time management also. If I have the paper planned
out with general ideas in the form of an outline, I can better estimate how
much time will be needed per paragraph, and therefore the whole paper. Also, I
do find myself revising my work as I go, re-reading sections and paragraphs at
a time. I rarely read through the whole paper after I am finished, because I
revise as I go.
But what else?
My approach probably is a mix between
sequential composer and heavy planner. I am a heavy planner in the sense that I
do a ton of outlining in my head before writing anything. However, I rarely
think about my writing when I am away from the computer. Although I do not
revise as much as I should, I revise more than a heavy planner would, and in
the way a sequential composer would—by paragraph or sections at a time, rather
than the whole paper at once.
Soooo is this good or bad? Or both?
I think for the most part my writing
process seems to be successful, however I have never tried anything else so I wouldn’t
really know. Some strengths would be that I know exactly what I want to write and how the
paper will go, and time management is fairly easy. However, a weakness is
probably that I don’t revise as much as I should. I definitely need to read the
paper or piece as a whole as part of the revision process because that is just
as important as revising small sections of the paper as I go.
Am I actually going to change anything?
I believe that it would be beneficial for
me to try different aspects of other approaches, rather than ditch mine all together.
Because I do like my writing process (now that I actually know what it is) the
way it is, but adding techniques from other writing processes could potentially
be more beneficial for me in the long run.
Visual Representation of my writing
process:
marysaddlernewt. "Current mood . . ." 12/15/15 via Tumblr. Content License. |
No comments:
Post a Comment